• Home
  • About Us
    • JoinCalifornia
    • Use as a Reference
  • California 175
    • 1849-1850 Events
    • Events Calendar
  • Political History
    • 2021 Senate to Assembly District Table
    • Covering the Capitol
    • Scott Lay’s Sofa Degree
    • Legislative Committee Reports
    • Legislative Staff
    • Term Limits in California
    • Notable No Votes
    • Redistricting
  • Nelson S. Dilworth Collection
    • California’s Military History
  • Leroy F. Greene Collection

One Voter Project

The Online Home of California's Political History

October 6, 2013 By rick Leave a Comment

Wage & Hour Litigation Just Became More Unfair for California Employers

Rick Morin, Sacramento Attorney
Rick Morin

The California Legislature recently passed, and the Governor enacted, Senate Bill 462 by Senator Bill Monning (D-Carmel) which disrupts the two-way street of fee shifting in wage and hour litigation.

SB 462 amends section 218.5 of the California Labor Code to preclude an employer from asking a court to award its reasonable attorney’s fees when it prevails in a lawsuit over the nonpayment of wages unless the court finds that the employee filed the lawsuit in bad faith.

The traditional “American Rule” when it comes to the payment of attorney’s fees is that parties to litigation typically pay their own attorney’s fees — it doesn’t matter who wins or who loses. This rule can be changed by contract or a provision of law.

Prior to the enactment of SB 462, the prevailing party in a wage and hour dispute was able to petition the court for an award of its attorneys fees on equal footing. With the enactment of SB 462, a prevailing employer may only ask for attorney’s fees if it can prove that an employee brought the wage and hour claim in “bad faith.”

SB 462 is unfair to business owners because it applies a different standard to the award of attorney’s fees depending on who asking: the standard is lower for employees, and the burden for a prevailing employer is much higher. What exactly constitutes “bad faith” is not defined in the legislation.

An award for attorney’s fees in a wage & hour dispute can often be many multiples more than the underlying damages. This has provided plaintiffs’ attorneys with a real incentive to bring numerous wage and hour claims to California courts because the attorney can make out like a bandit even if they only win $1 in court for their client.

Now that plaintiffs and their attorneys know that they will not likely be stuck paying a large attorneys’ fee award to a prevailing employer, they can bring even more meritless claims into California courts.

SB 462 will take effect January 1, 2014.

Please contact my office if you have any questions about SB 462 or wage and hour litigation. I can be reached at (916) 333-2222.

Filed Under: California law, Current Research, Editorial, State Senate, Top Stories

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent News

New 2025 “California Lawmaker” Released

December 14, 2024

The new edition of "California Lawmaker" by JoinCalifornia.com editor Alex … [Read More...]

Legislative Retirement

December 8, 2024

In December 2024, Assemblyman Corey Jackson introduced legislation (ACA 2 of … [Read More...]

Adding Candidates

March 7, 2024

When to add candidates to the election data is always an interesting question. … [Read More...]

First Women to Chair Legislative Committees

January 25, 2024

I was recently asked who the first woman to chair a committee was. As it turns … [Read More...]

What Happened in the 2022 Election

November 13, 2022

[Updated 12/12] That was interesting. An election season that roared by in … [Read More...]

Latest Tweets

  • Just now
  • More Tweets by Alex Vassar

Fun Fact

Did you know that seven JoinCalifornia candidates have stars on the Hollywood Walk? They are; Mike Curb (Lt. Governor), Albert Dekker (Assemblyman), Helen Gahagan Douglas (Member of Congress), George Murphy (US Senator), Ronald Reagan (Governor & President), Arnold Schwarzenegger (Governor), and Shirley Temple (Congressional candidate).

California Lawmaker 2021

Now Available on Amazon

Recent Posts

  • Legislator Hometowns December 19, 2024
  • New 2025 “California Lawmaker” Released December 14, 2024
  • Legislative Retirement December 8, 2024
  • Adding Candidates March 7, 2024

Copyright © 2025 · Education Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in